Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Daniel Mutton (instructed by Penningtons) appeared on behalf of the applicant former wife
          This discrete judgement solely concerns several issues of legal costs in a wholly sharing case.� It does not concern costs in the needs scenario.�
          There 3 costs aspects namely
a.        How should costs owing by either party to their lawyers at the final hearing in the sharing exercise be treated if they are materially different in any way
b.       How should the costs incurred by either party and already taken, advanced, from marital assets being shared equally be treated in the sharing exercise if they are materially different
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.