Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 1 P1 • Deprivation of property • Applicant�s lawfully acquired land declared State property according to the legislation on land situated on the seacoast • Applicant declared the user of the land until dispossession • Absence of compensation despite right to compensation provided by law • Lack of clarity of the relevant law
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Robert Spano, President, ��������� Marko Bo�njak, ��������� Valeriu Griţco, ��������� Ivana Jelić, ��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen, ��������� Saadet Y�ksel, ��������� Peeter Roosma, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar,
the application against Montenegro lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Serbian national, Mr Ilija Ne�ić (�the applicant�), on 3 March 2018;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.