Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Sir John Nutting, Bt., Q.C., President; John Martin, Q.C., and; Jonathan Crow, Q.C..
Application for leave to appeal against sentence of the Superior Number of the Royal Court passed on 23 rd February on 2 counts of indecent assault, 1 count of incest and 1 count of attempted indecent assault.
This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence by P (" the Applicant "). An application for leave to appeal against conviction has been abandoned. No complaint is made about the orders made under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010 . At the close of the Applicant's oral argument yesterday, we refused leave to appeal. We will now give our reasons.
The Applicant was convicted on the 5 th July 2011 at an Assize trial on three counts of sexual offences committed against C, the Applicant's daughter, on various dates between 1988 and 1991. They consisted of indecent assault (involving oral sex) and sexual intercourse when the victim was 13, and an attempted indecent assault (involving stroking the victim's vagina) when she was 16. The Applicant was aged between 31 and 35 at the time the offences were committed.
On a separate indictment the Applicant was also convicted in January 2012 on one count of indecent assault (involving touching the vagina and bottom) of D, a 12 year-old girl, between June and December 1998.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.