Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Gavin Howe for the Applicant The Respondent in person (assisted by a McKenzie Friend Hearing dates: 11th & 13th April 2022 ____________________
i) As a matter of practice, the court will usually embark on a two-stage exercise, (i) computation and (ii) distribution;� Charman v Charman [ 2007] EWCA Civ 503 .
ii) The objective of the court is to achieve an outcome which ought to be "as fair as possible in all the circumstances"; per Lord Nicholls at 983H in� White v White� [2000] 2 FLR 981 .
iii) There is no place for discrimination between husband and wife and their respective roles;� White v White �at 989C.
iv) In an evaluation of fairness, the court is required to have regard to the s25 criteria, first consideration being given to any child of the family.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.