Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
����������������������������������������������� [Supreme Court Appeal No: 180/2018]
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ����������� Appellant
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ������������� ��������� ����Respondents
      The issue in this appeal is whether a long-term prisoner who has been transferred to the Central Mental Hospital (�the CMH�), on foot of a diagnosis of mental illness, is entitled to be considered for conditional release.
      In 2017 the appellant applied to the first named respondent, the Parole Board, for an assessment for parole. The Board took the view that it could not consider his application while he was detained in the CMH. For the same reason, the second named respondent, the Minister, says that he cannot consider an application for temporary release.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.