Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 (civil) • Access to court • Inability of applicants, injured parties to criminal proceedings, to have their civil claims determined as entitled to by law, as a result of judicial authorities� total inactivity which led to prosecution being time-barred
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
the applications (nos. 345/21, 6319/21, 6321/21 and 9227/21) against the Republic of San Marino lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by three San Marinese nationals, Mr Mario Foschi, Mr Stellino Fabbri and Mr Andrea Forcellini and one Italian national Ms Angelina Marro (�the applicants�), on the various dates indicated in the appended table;
the decision to give notice to the San Marinese Government (�the Government�) of the applications;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.