X v Y

Mr James Leslie for the Applicant Miss Sima Najma for the Respondent Hearing dates: 21,22,23,24th June, 12th July 2022 ____________________

with respect to this issue, although in truth it is more properly characterised as an assertion of non disclosure.

�12,750) and the value of the Wife's gold currently in her possession (�3,300 per W or �5,850 per H) together with different figures being given by the parties for the contents of the Husband's bank accounts at present (unusually, a higher figure provided by him of �63,411 and �46,381 by the Wife).

Wife's claim. I consider this to be separate land from that still owned by the Husband (the �122,000 land) as the Husband continued, I find, to receive rent (that is the payment of �5,000 previously referred to) after this transfer, so it must relate to additional/other land.

made the decisions, he controlled the money, she did as she was told, and she had no real, meaningful power in this area of her life or their life together.