Miss Fitz argues that he acted only through fear and that he was duped. She said that he was assisted by his clean record and by his references and, looking at those, he was clearly a kindly man. We have to say that the case of Campbell, Molloy and MacKenzie draws no distinction between importation and possession with intent to supply.
As Crown Advocate Sharpe reminds us we must look to see whether this Court feels that the four years imposed is safe and satisfactory and not manifestly excessive. Now, on that basis we have no hesitation in saying that we are completely confident that the four years is a correct sentence to be imposed and on that basis we refuse leave to appeal.
Authorities
Campbell, Molloy, and MacKenzie-v-AG (1995) JLR 136 . CofA
AG-v-Rayson (13 February 1995) Jersey Unreported