Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Family life • Domestic court failure genuinely take into account allegations of �grave risk� of harm or exposure to an intolerable situation in returning abducted child under the Hague Convention to a conflict zone in eastern Ukraine • Insufficient reasoning by domestic court falling short of procedural requirements inherent in Art 8
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the application against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Russian and Ukrainian national, Y.S. (�the first applicant�), on behalf of herself and her daughter, O.S. (�the second applicant�), who also has both Russian and Ukrainian nationality, on 7 March 2017;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.