Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr. Michael Nolan (instructed by Loudouns) for the Claimant/Owners Mr. Yash Kulkarni (instructed by Jackson Parton) for the Respondent/Charterers Hearing date: 5 December 2014 ____________________
i) The voyage which the disponent owners had agreed to perform was a voyage from Constanza to Djibouti. After discharge at Djibouti the voyage would have ended.
ii) However, the vessel was delayed at Djibouti because there were no receivers and the discharge port was changed, ultimately, to Damietta.
iii) As a result of the change of the discharge port to Damietta the voyage would not end until the vessel had sailed north, transited the Suez Canal and discharged her cargo at Damietta.
iv) A voyage from Constanza to Djibouti and back north through the Canal to Damietta was a more expensive voyage than that originally contracted for.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.