Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Reasonable time • Overall length of compensation proceedings, lasting more than eight years at four levels of jurisdiction , not exceeding what may be considered reasonable in case circumstances
Art 1 P1 • Deprivation of property • Demolition of applicant's building on the ground that its construction was illegal and annulment of his title thereto without compensation • Disproportionate burden on applicant who was made to bear all consequences for creating situation leading to building's demolition despite shared responsibility for it • Particular importance of the principle of good governance in this context • No indication of bad faith on the applicant's part • Failure to strike a fair balance between the public interest and applicant's property rights
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Jolien Schukking , President , Darian Pavli, Peeter Roosma, Ioannis Ktistakis, Andreas Zünd, Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir, Diana Kovatcheva , judges , and Milan Blaško, Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.