Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
UNAPPROVED �������������������������������������������������������� NO REDACTION� NEEDED
Donnelly J.���������������������������������������������������� � Neutral Citation Number [2022] IECA 290
             This judgment concerns whether or not the respondent gave sufficient reasons when expressing its conclusions on a renewal order in respect of the appellant. The impugned decision is dated the 12 February 2021 and affirmed a renewal order dated the 25 January 2021 authorizing the detention of the applicant as an involuntary patient in the relevant hospital for a six-month period ending on the 26 July 2021.
             The following reliefs were originally sought:
(a)           A declaration that the decision was made in breach of the respondent�s statutory duty to give reasons, pursuant to s. 18(5) of the 2001 Act;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.