Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Mrs F. Tulkens, President, Mr I. Cabral Barreto, Mr R. Türmen, Mr M. Ugrekhelidze, Mr V. Zagrebelsky, Mrs A. Mularoni, Mr D. Popović, judges, and Mrs F. Elens-passos, Deputy Section Registrar ,
The case originated in an application (no. 26576/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Hasan Genç (“the applicant”), on 23 March 2002 .
The applicant was represented by Mr H. Işık, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.