Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcribed from the official recording by eScribers Ltd Ludgate House, 107-111 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AB Tel: 0330 100 5223 | Email: [email protected] | uk.escribers.net
MR S NUVOLONI KC appeared on behalf of the Applicant MR B McALINDEN appeared on behalf of the First Respondent MR M FIDDY appeared on behalf of the Respondent Children (by their Children's Guardian, Julie Lynex) ____________________
This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
"(1) Section 91 (14) should be read in conjunction with section 1(1) which makes the�welfare of the child�the paramount consideration.
(2) The power to restrict applications to the court is�discretionary�and in the exercise of its discretion the court must weigh in the balance all the relevant circumstances.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.