Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
The case originated in an application (no. 56452/00) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Slovakian national, Karol Nezbeda (“the applicant”), on 7 February 2000.
The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr P. Vršanský.
On 18 June 2002 the Fourth Section declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaints concerning the length of the proceedings and the alleged absence of an effective remedy to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the remainder of the application at the same time as its admissibility.
On 10 December 2002 and on 16 December 2002, the applicant and the Agent of the Government respectively submitted formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.