Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  The applicant was granted leave to apply for judicial review on the 15 November 2024, having filed her statement of grounds on the 11 September 2024. She seeks to quash the Decision on grounds set out in her Statement of Grounds, which can be summarised as:
(a)           The Tribunal failed to take account of the United States Department of State ( USDOS ) report on Human Rights 2024, which reported on events from 2023;
(b)          The Tribunal's reliance on country-of-origin information (COI ) was unreasonable or selective and led to an irrational conclusion;
(c)           �The Tribunal correctly identified the test to be applied in a consideration of the question of state protection, but failed to apply the test properly;
(d)          The Tribunal unreasonably concluded in the particular circumstances of the case that there was effective independent oversight of the police in Georgia.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.