Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
��������� Isabelle Berro-Lef�vre, President, ��������� Elisabeth Steiner, ��������� Nina Vajić, ��������� Anatoly Kovler, ��������� Khanlar Hajiyev, ��������� Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, ��������� Erik M�se, judges, and S�ren Nielsen, Section Registrar ,
�... [the applicant�s] mental condition prevented him from taking part in the hearing, and, moreover, [his] presence would be prejudicial to his health�.
The court further refused to commission a new expert examination by a non-State psychiatric association, on the ground that only State-run institutions were allowed by law to conduct such examinations and issue reports. The relevant part of the District Court judgment reads as follows:
�... under section 1 of the Psychiatric Care Act ... State forensic examination activity in judicial proceedings is carried out by State forensic examination institutions, and consists of organising and implementing the forensic examination�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.