Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Representation: For the Applicant: Claire Wills-Goldingham KC, instructed by the Applicant LA For the First Respondent: Jennifer Kotilaine, instructed by BH&O LLP Solicitors For the Second Respondent: Alicia Collinson, instructed by Griffiths Robertson solicitors For the Third Respondent: Craig Jeakings, instructed by Trueman's solicitors For the Fourth Respondent: Alison Williams, instructed by Oxford Law Group Ltd For the Fifth Respondent: Anne Davies of Reeds solicitors Hearing dates: 21-25, 28-30 November, 1 December 2022, 24 January 2023 ____________________
First Respondent Mother, [M], had, at the relevant time, a significant and serious history of substance misuse including both drugs (heroin) and alcohol
First Respondent Mother, [M], was continuing to abuse alcohol at the relevant time.
This caused C to suffer significant physical and emotional harm and neglect and placed her at risk of the same.
The First Respondent Mother, [M], and Second Respondent father, F, have exposed their daughter C to numerous incidences of domestic violence over many years. This has caused C significant emotional harm.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.