Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 13 (+ Art 6 � 1) • Effective remedy • Systemic flaws rendering constitutional redress proceedings ineffective in respect of length-of-proceedings complaints • Lack of speediness • Regular practice of unreasonably low compensation awards
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar,
. The case originated in two applications (nos. 77209/16 and 77225/16 ) against the Republic of Malta lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by two Maltese nationals, Mr Michael Galea and Mr Edward Pavia (�the applicants�), on 9 December 2016.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.