Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              I agree with the judgment of Dunne J and, for the reasons set out in her judgment, I agree that the appeal must be dismissed. In light of the importance of some of the issues raised by the appeal, I wish to add some observations of my own.
              But, NS says, section 56(9)(d) of the 2015 Act is incompatible with EU law. For reasons I shall explain, that is a bold claim and one which raises significant constitutional issues.
              Article 29.7 of the Constitution provides that:
iii under Protocol No. 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice so annexed, [to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union] including the option that the said Protocol No. 21 shall, in whole or in part, cease to apply to the State,
but any such exercise shall be subject to the prior approval of both Houses of the Oireachtas. " [6]
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.