Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Sara Masters QC, Edward Ho and Leonora Sagan (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the Claimant/Respondent Gordon Pollock QC, Salim Moollan and Emily Wood (instructed by Hogan Lovells LLP) for the Defendants/Applicants Hearing dates: 16 and 17 February 2015 ____________________
i) First, would the determination of the preliminary issue dispose of the case or at least one aspect of it?
ii) Second, would the determination of the preliminary issue significantly cut down the cost and time involved in pre-trial preparation or in connection with the trial itself?
iii) Third, where the preliminary issue was one of law the Court should ask itself how much effort would be involved in identifying the relevant facts;
iv) Fourth, if the preliminary issue was one of law to what extent was it to be determined on agreed facts?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.