Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Charles Hogan, instructed by Wilsons solicitors, for the Applicant father (previously Sarah Jennings, instructed by Royds Withy King solicitors, for the Applicant father)
Andrew Leong, instructed by Oxfordshire County Council for the First Respondent local authority
June Rodgers, instructed by Oxford Law Group, solicitors for the Second Respondent mother
KT, Cafcass children�s guardian, representing herself at final hearing (previously instructing Truemans on behalf of the Third Respondent child)
The parents were married but are now separated, and have four children together; twins M and R, now eighteen, S, who is the subject of this application, aged fourteen, and T, ten, who was adopted in 2017.� �
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.