Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
����������������������������������������������������������������������� ��� Neutral Citation Number [2025] IECA 147
                  Mr. O'Connor - understandably, since he had lost - was dissatisfied with the judgments.
                  Mr. O'Connor's motion was not, in truth, an application pursuant to O. 28, r. 11 but an application to vary or rescind a final judgment of the Court of Appeal.� The motion was de-listed and Mr. O'Connor was directed to make any application he wished in accordance with Court of Appeal Practice Direction CA14.
                  On 25 th June, 2025 Mr. O'Connor filed a "CA14 SHORT SUBMISSION" in which he first protested that the practice direction is unconstitutional and then set out his complaints in relation to [2025] IECA 39 .
                  The practice direction commences by reciting Article 34.4.3 of Bunreacht na h�ireann, which provides that:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.