Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
These proceedings were initiated by way of Special Summons dated the 6th July 2000 whereby the Applicant claimed inter alia
By Order of the 6th July 2001 pursuant to the Applicant's Notice of Motion dated the 30th May 2001 by consent it was ordered:
It was also ordered that the Attorney General be joined as a Notice Party for the trial of the issue.
The Respondent claims that the divorce obtained on the 13th July 1994 under the civil law of the Netherlands is entitled to recognition in this State pursuant to the 1995 Act. The Applicant disputes and denies that this is so. There are two grounds upon which the Respondent bases his claim. The first is that on the date when the divorce was obtained under the civil law of the Netherlands he was domiciled in that jurisdiction.
The second ground is that the Respondent claimed that a divorce obtained in the Netherlands on the basis of residence, as the divorce obtained on the 13th July 1994 was, is entitled to recognition in this State.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.