Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Ganna Yudkivska, President, ��������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Motoc, ��������� Carlo Ranzoni, ��������� Georges Ravarani, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar ,
The case originated in an application (no. 27227/08 ) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 6 June 2008 by S.C. Antares Transport S.A. (�the first applicant company�) and S.C. Transroby S.R.L. (�the second applicant company�), both Romanian commercial companies located in R�mnicu-V�lcea.
Under Article 41 of the Convention the first applicant company sought just satisfaction in the sum of 2,101,361.02 Romanian lei (ROL-472,789 euros (EUR)) in respect of pecuniary damage. The second applicant company claimed ROL 120,308.39 (EUR 27,069) in respect of pecuniary damage.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.