Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Alun Jones QC & Mr Hugo Lodge (instructed by Jeffrey Green Russell) for the Claimant Mr Edmund Lawson QC & Mr Jason Beer (instructed by The Legal Services Department of "A" Police) for the First Defendant Hearing dates: 19th, 20th September 2006 ____________________
That observation was repeated with approval by Bingham J. in R v. Crown Court at Lewes, ex p. Hill (1991) 93 Cr App R 60 (at p. 66).
(2) The grounds for believing that no special procedure material would be included in the search
(3) The grounds for believing that the conditions specified in s-s. (3) were satisfied
But the police are not at a stage in their enquiries where they are prepared to exclude the Claimant. They believe that it would be wrong to do so until they have interviewed P and heard what he has to say. Mr. Lawson was not prepared to commit to a timetable: indeed what he told the Court on instructions suggested that the matter was likely to remain open for several more weeks.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.