Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Tribunal:������������������ First-Tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) (Information Rights)
Please note the Summary of Decision is included for the convenience of readers. It does not form part of the decision. The Decision and Reasons of the judge follow.
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve an error of law.
           The IC was not a party to the proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal in this case (for reasons explained in IC v Spiers and Garstang Medical Practice [2022] UKUT 93 (AAC) , [2023] AACR 3), but I granted permission for the IC to be joined as an interested party, given the bearing that the subject matter has on the IC's exercise of his statutory functions.
           Four years ago, in another case involving the present parties (case number UA-2022-000045-GIA), Judge Wikeley began a decision as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.