Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed)
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 30 January 2020,
K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG, established in Wuppertal (Germany), represented by A. Haudan, Rechtsanwalt,
Tecnium, SL, established in Manresa (Spain), represented by E. Sugrañes Coca, abogada,
composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, Vice-President of the Court, M. Safjan and L. Bay Larsen (Rapporteur), Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.