Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
"1. As of the 6th April, 2009 please furnish documentation to show that the financial conditions relating to [the] development were compliant to include the conditioned contributions and bonds associated with:
Please also furnish copies of any written agreements that may have been issued in relation to the contributions and bonds prior to the 6th April, 2009. The planning permissions granted state "prior to commencement or as otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority pay the sum of €xxx, with any outstanding balance being updated at the 1st of January each year ... .".
On 9 August 2011, the applicant sought a review by this Office of the Council's refusal of the request.
In carrying out my review, I have had regard to copies of the records considered by the Council to be relevant to the request (which were provided to this Office for the purposes of the Commissioner's review); to correspondence between the Council and the applicant as set out above; to details of various contacts between this Office and the Council and between this Office and the applicant; and to details of a letter sent by Ms Anne Lyons, Investigator, to what the Council has described as the "current" developer, dated 8 May 2013.
As the timeframe in which Ms Lyons invited a response to her letter of 8 May 2013 to the developer has elapsed without reply, I have decided to conclude the review by way of a formal binding decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.