Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, President, ��������� Andr�s Saj�, ��������� Nona Tsotsoria, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 73999/14 ) against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Hungarian national, Mr G�bor Nagy (�the applicant�), on 17 November 2014.
The applicant was represented by Mr I. Barbalics, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government (�the Government�) were represented by Mr Z. Tall�di, Agent at the Ministry of Justice.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.