Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Valeriu Griţco, President, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Darian Pavli, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 74305/17 ) against the Republic of Lithuania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Lithuanian national, Mr Augustinas �emaitis (�the applicant�), on 13 October 2017.
The applicant was represented by Ms M. Gu�auskienė, a lawyer practising in Vilnius. The Lithuanian Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, Ms L. Urbaitė.
On 5 September 2018 the complaints concerning the alleged ill-treatment by the police and lack of an effective investigation under Article 3 of the Convention were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 � 3 of the Rules of Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.