Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Paul Sinclair (instructed by Addleshaw Goddard) for the Claimant Alec Haydon (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 19, 20 January 2012 ____________________
Each of these heads of claim was supported by separate invoices and, where appropriate, vouchers and other documents as referred to in a detailed schedule exhibited to the first written statement of Mr Gebrael.
US $2,013,566.59 - US $332,676.56 - US $1,039,322.03 - US $59,548.00 US $582,020.00
US $606,271.06 �390,399 - 17,590.60 - 30,442.62 - 21,776.00 - 231,827.87 US $241,513.30 �84,732.34
This produces an overall amount of US $5,061,626.69 and �271,675.24. From these figures, there needs to be deducted the agreed credit of US $187,218.53 and the further set-off referred to in paragraphs 27-28 above (ie US $359,894.05) resulting in a net balance by way of summary judgment in the sum of US $4,514,514.11 and �271,675.24. IPT is also entitled to interest as computed above.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.