Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Opinion of the Court in terms of section 194D(3) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995
[2] Answers were lodged in the name of a firm of law agents (Messrs Aamer Anwar & Co). On the court enquiring what interest the firm might have in the matter, counsel instructed by them intimated that he (and the agents) were actually acting for the respondents. The instance of the answers was amended accordingly.
[4] The application to the petitioners has been made by relatives of only two of the passengers who died on board the flight. It may, or may not, also proceed at the instance of some family members of the deceased, including a person said to be the deceased’s executor, but their interest is not directly the subject-matter of this petition.
(1) Where a person convicted of an offence has died, any person may, subject to the provisions of this section, apply to the High Court for an order authorising him to institute or continue any appeal which could have been or has been instituted by the deceased.
(4) Where an application is made for an order under this section and the applicant—
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.