Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
By orders of the High Court (O'Neill J.) dated 28 th July, 2003, the applicants in both cases were given leave to apply by way of judicial review for certain declaratory and other relief including in particular orders of certiorari quashing decisions of the respondent made on the 1 st April, 2003, to refuse to revoke deportation orders which have been made and remain in force in respect of the applicants R.C. and A.C.
On 27 th May, 2003, it was decided on behalf of the respondent by Mr. Mortell that the application to revoke the deportation order in respect of R.C. should be refused. The decision is contained in a document of the same date which was adduced in evidence during the course of the proceedings. The document comprising the decision (and the report and recommendation which gave rise to the document) did not become available to the applicants (and to the court) until the proceedings had commenced and were at hearing.
Accordingly the applicants sought leave and were permitted to amend the grounds upon which they were relying in support of their application.
The letter addressed to A.C. was returned to the respondent marked " not called for ."
A.C. failed to attend at Dundalk Garda Station on 16 th August, 2002, as required and was classed as having avoided deportation on 16 th August, 2002.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.