Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1] On 20 December 2010 at Edinburgh High Court the appellant was convicted of the following charge:
[2] The appellant was tried with five co-accused. One of them, Stephen Donald, was convicted in the same terms as the appellant. Another, Andrew Sellars, pled guilty in similar terms, but with a restricted latitude.
[4] Shortly after the meeting Sellars made a phone call in Ladbrokes in which he was heard by DC Sievewright to say:
"I gave the boy six grand and he was happy. I'm going to see him at seven or half seven but the boy doesn't want anyone else knowing about it so I'll be going myself."
[6] Shortly thereafter the appellant and Sellars were stopped by the police. In the boot of Sellars' car there was heroin worth about �6,000 - �7,000. In the driver's door pocket of both cars there were latex gloves. At the appellant's home there was a foil wrap on a mantelpiece and �220 hidden inside a book in a wardrobe.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.