Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
�������� LechGarlicki, President, �������� David Th�rBj�rgvinsson, �������� P�iviHirvel�, �������� GeorgeNicolaou, �������� LediBianku, �������� Neboj�aVučinić, �������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, judges andFatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar ,
The prosecutor requested the validation of the applicant�s provisional detention with a view to his extradition to the United States.
The diplomatic note further stated that five charges carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment (nos. 1-2 and 6-8); two charges carried a maximum penalty of forty years� imprisonment (nos. 3 and 4); one charge carried a maximum sentence of twenty years� imprisonment (no. 5); and another charge carried a penalty of either death or life imprisonment (no. 9). The diplomatic note further stated that an arrest warrant had been issued against the applicant on 19 August 2010 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.