Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment was delivered in private.� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the child and members of his family must be strictly preserved.� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.� Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Suite 204, Kingfisher Business Centre, Burnley Road, Rawtenstall, Lancashire BB4 8ES
The court is concerned with the welfare of A, a boy born on 4 th September 2016 and so now aged 8 months.�
The local authority issued an application on 14 th September seeking a care order in respect of A and it now seeks a care order together with a placement order in order to achieve permanence for A outside his birth family, orders which are supported by A�s children�s guardian, Mrs McGuaghey �and opposed by A�s mother, M.� She seeks an order, I think any order, that would enable A to come and live with her.�
A�s father has never been identified.� Three potential fathers named by mother have not been confirmed on DNA testing.� A fourth proved to be impossible to contact so the local authority has drawn a blank in identifying him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.