Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
James Mellor QC and Andrew Lykiardopoulos (instructed by Taylor Wessing LLP) for the Claimant Richard Meade QC and Tom Moody-Stuart (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 1-5 September 2008 ____________________
i) a vapour permeable upper that is associated with a vapour permeable or perforated lining.
v) a vapour-permeable or perforated filler layer arranged between said insole and said membrane;
vi) the lower part of said upper, said tread, said mid-sole with said membrane being perimetrically sealed in the coupling regions such that non-vapour permeable regions are arranged so as to be substantially limited to the perimetric regions of the sole and vapour-permeable regions are arranged substantially inside the perimetric coupling regions.
i) A two- to four-ply lining laminate (see top left in the figure), which comprises (from inside to outside):
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.