Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Neboj�a Vučinić, President, ��������� Valeriu Griţco, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 1065/06 ) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a British national, Mr Robert Mackenzie Ellis (�the applicant�), on 7 December 2005.
The applicant was represented by Mr M. An, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent.
On 10 September 2015 the complaints raised under Articles 6, 13 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the applicant�s inability to secure the enforcement of the judgment in his favour were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 � 3 of the Rules of Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.