Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Application no. 7849/12 R.O. against the United Kingdom lodged on 6 February 2012
The applicant made further representations 27 May 2011, which were rejected as not amounting to a fresh claim for asylum on 7 June 2011. None of the information submitted by the applicant was found to advance his claim. He had submitted no evidence to support his claim to be suffering from depression and anxiety. The applicant was taken into immigration detention on 19 January 2012 and directions were set for his removal.
Would the applicant, if removed to Syria, face a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention by reason of the general situation of violence prevailing in that country at the present time?
Of what relevance is the fact that other European States, such as the Netherlands and Sweden, have suspended removals to Syria?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.