Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MS G SESSI  appeared on behalf of the Applicant Father under the Direct Access Scheme
MS ADAMS (solicitor) appeared on behalf of the Child, through their Children's Guardian
This judgment was delivered in private.� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.� Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
             JUDGE WHYBROW:� �This is the judgment of the court in a case that concerns A, who is 3 years old.� A�s parents are MA, who represents herself, and FA, who is represented by Ms Sessi in these proceedings, instructed under the Direct Access Scheme.� A is represented by a guardian from CAFCASS and by Mrs Adams, who is the instructed solicitor.�
             The parents are both in their early 30s.� MA is married to �MH�.� She lives in Scotland and they there look after both A and their own child, who was born a little over a year ago, �B�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.