Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 -� Respect for family life -� International child abduction -� Authorities' failure to act with required fairness and promptitude -� Political pressure on courts and child-care authorities -� Respondent State providing legal and financial support to abducting parent
T his judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
Robert Spano, President, Marko Bošnjak, Valeriu Griţco, Egidijus Kūris, Ivana Jelić, Arnfinn Bårdsen, Saadet Yüksel, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,
. On 11 January 2005 a daughter, Luisa ( the second applicant), was born to the couple in Germany . Parental responsibility was exercised jointly by both parents. In the course of March 2005 the spouses began living separately. The child remained with her mother but maintained frequent contact with her father. At a later stage, divorce proceedings were initiated by the first applicant before the Oranienburg District Court ( Amtsgericht Oranienburg ) in Germany.
A. Proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.