UI2021001769 & Ors

             This has been a remote hearing which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was by video, using Teams. There were occasional difficulties with the video connection to the Appellants' solicitors, but anything missed was repeated without difficulty. The papers were all available electronically.

              Three further money transfer receipts dated April, June and July (presumably 2021 but the full date is not shown) were submitted to the First-tier Tribunal. The amounts shown were not in pound sterling, but on current exchange rates totalled around £190.

              A letter from 1 st Call Business Services Limited dated 5 April 2023 confirms the First Appellant's suitability for a caretaking operative role at £11 per hour payable monthly. An employment commencement date was to be confirmed upon receipt of confirmation of eligibility to work in the United Kingdom; national insurance details; a satisfactory criminal reference disclosure and a satisfactory reference from previous employer. Employment was also subject to a six month probation period.

          In relation to the offer of employment for the First Appellant, the Sponsor did not know how many hours the contract would be for or whether the First Appellant had supplied any of the required documents listed in the letter. She did not however think it would be a problem to obtain a reference from his previous employer as although he is not currently working, the First Appellant last worked around 8 months ago.

          The Sponsor pays the Appellants' rent on an annual basis and otherwise sends him maybe £50 or £100 a month. She does not keep receipts so there is no recent evidence of any recent transfers.