Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Brent Molyneux KC and George Coates (instructed by DMH Stallard LLP ) for the Applicant
This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.30am on 31 October 2023 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.
                  Before me is what is colloquially known as a Daniels v Walker application, made by the Wife ("W") at this Pre-Trial Review in financial remedy proceedings ahead of a 5-day final hearing on 6 November 2023 before Stephen Trowell KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. It is opposed by the Husband ("H"). I observe that we are now under three weeks away from that fixture which has been diarised for many months.
                  Contrary to the requirements of the 2016 High Court Efficiency Statement, counsel for W lodged a detailed position statement of 18 pages, and counsel for H lodged a position statement of 15 pages. The Efficiency Statement for High Court cases is crystal clear:
i. for the first appointment, or any other interim hearing, 10 pages (including any attached schedules)."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.