Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeals - Officials - Grade A 1 post - Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations - Notice of vacancy - Documents drawn up after the contested decision)
Eoghan O'Hannrachain, official of the European Parliament, residing in Cents (Luxembourg), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, avocats,
appellant, APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2001 in Case T-97/99 Chamier and O'Hannrachain v Parliament [2001] ECR-SC I-A-1 and II-1, seeking to have that judgment set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: European Parliament, represented by J. Schoo, H. von Hertzen and D. Moore, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, avocat, with an address for service in Luxembourg, defendant at first instance, THE COURT (Second Chamber),
composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President of the Sixth Chamber, acting for the President of the Second Chamber, V. Skouris and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges, Advocate General: L.A. Geelhoed, Registrar: H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar,
'The appointing authority shall, acting solely in the interest of the service and without regard to nationality, assign each official by appointment or transfer to a post in his category or service which corresponds to his grade.'
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.