Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment is delivered in private.� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.� Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
The children concerned in this application are E born on 16 th April 2006, F born on 28 th August 2009 and R born on 1 st May 2012.�
The mother of all three children issued an application dated 25 th February 2014 in respect of all the children for permission to apply to revoke the placement orders made on 8 th May 2013.� E is the father of F and E.� He played no part in these proceedings.� The father of R is D, (the father).�
It was agreed that this hearing should proceed by way of submissions only and without any oral evidence.
Starting at A8 is the judgment which I delivered dated 8 th May 2013 in the care and placement proceedings.� In paragraph 2 of that judgment I said as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.