Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Georgios A. Serghides, President, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 46206/10 ) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Russian national, Mr Abu Kabilov (�the applicant�), on 20 July 2010.
The applicant was represented by Ms V. Kogan and Mr E. Wesselink from the Stichting Russian Justice Initiative, in partnership with another NGO, Astreya (�SRJI/Astreya�). The Russian Government (�the Government�) were initially represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin.
On 7 January 2016 notice of the complaints concerning the investigation into the abduction of the applicant�s son and the lack of effective remedies in that regard was given to the Government and the remainder of the application, including a complaint under the substantive limb of Article 2 of the Convention and a complaint under Article 5 of the Convention, was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 � 3 of the Rules of Court. The Government did not object to the examination of the application by a Committee
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.