Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section) sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Nona Tsotsoria, President, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Marko Bo�njak, judges,
The case originated in an application (no. 43355/11 ) against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by eight Hungarian nationals, Mr B�la Temesfői, Mr Zolt�n Csepi, Mr J�zsef Moln�r, Mr Tibor Kov�cs, Mr Attila Fekete, Mr Fl�ri�n M�rton, Mr J�zsef Kelemen and Mr Istv�n Dud�s (�the applicants�), on 12 July 2011.
The applicants were represented by Mr T. Borsos, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government (�the Government�) were represented by Mr Z. Tall�di, Agent at the Ministry of Justice.
The applicants were heard as suspects on different dates (the first applicant on 5 July 2002, the second applicant on 3 October 2001, the third and fourth applicants on 9 October 2001, the fifth applicant on 4 October 2001, the sixth applicant on 18 March 2002, the seventh applicant on 27 December 2000 and the eighth applicant on 21 December 2000).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.