Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Andr�s Saj�, President, ��������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, ��������� Nona Tsotsoria, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Marko Bo�njak, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 58216/12 ) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by three Filipino nationals (�the applicants�), Mrs J. (�the first applicant�), Mrs G. (�the second applicant�) and Mrs C. (�the third applicant�), on 4 September 2012. The President of the Section acceded to the applicants� request not to have their names disclosed (Rule 47 � 4 of the Rules of Court).
The applicants were represented by Mr Adam Weiss, Legal Director of the AIRE Centre, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) with its registered office in London. The Austrian Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, Mr H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.