Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 à 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
Vincent A. De Gaetano, President, Branko Lubarda, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, Georgios A. Serghides, Jolien Schukking, María Elósegui, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar,
. For a summary of relevant domestic law and practice and relevant international material and practice, see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia ([GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08 , §§ 53-66 and §§ 70-76, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
B. Metal cages in remand prisons for participation in court hearings via a video link
. In accordance with the Programme, on 18 April 2014 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Administrative Office of Courts at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Federal Prison Service concluded an agreement concerning their use of videoconferencing systems. Annex 2 to that agreement provided for the installation of metal partitions in remand prisons equipped with videoconferencing systems to secure the videoconferencing equipment while inmates participated in court hearings via a video link.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.